翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Electronic Payments Network ・ Electronic performance support systems ・ Electronic Personal Dosimeter ・ Electronic pest control ・ Electronic piano ・ Electronic Pleasure ・ Electronic Poet ・ Electronic Poetry Center ・ Electronic pollbook ・ Electronic portfolio ・ Electronic Power Control ・ Electronic power of attorney ・ Electronic prescribing ・ Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances ・ Electronic Privacy Information Center ・ Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Justice ・ Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science ・ Electronic process of law ・ Electronic process of law in Brazil ・ Electronic Product Code ・ Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool ・ Electronic Products ・ Electronic program guide ・ Electronic Projects for Musicians ・ Electronic publishing ・ Electronic Punks ・ Electronic quantum holography ・ Electronic Quarterback ・ Electronic Recording Machine, Accounting ・ Electronic Records Archives Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Justice ： ウィキペディア英語版 Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Justice EPIC v. Department of Justice is a 2014 case in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia between the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) where EPIC seeks court action to enforce their Freedom of Information Act request for documents that the Department of Justice has withheld pertaining to George W. Bush's authorization of NSA warrantless surveillance.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Freedom of Information Act Work on the National Security Agency's Warrantless Surveillance Program )〕 ==Background== In December 16, 2005, the ''New York Times'' published an article revealing that President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to "eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the US to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying."〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts )〕 Foreshadowing the secrecy at issue in this case, the White House asked the New York Times to not publish the article as it could "() continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny."〔 The New York Times agreed to delay publication for a year in order to conduct additional reporting, which resulted in the omission of information that "administration officials argued could be useful to terrorists" from the final article.〔 Just four hours after the publication of this article, EPIC submitted a FOIA request to the Department of Justice for the legal justification behind the "Warrantless Wiretapping" program of President Bush. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Justice」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.